Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty was payable on clearance of old plant and machinery sold as scrap when no Cenvat or Modvat credit had been taken on the capital goods and the goods had been acquired before the Modvat scheme for capital goods came into force.
Analysis: Liability under Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 arises only where Cenvat credit has been taken on the capital goods and such capital goods are subsequently removed. The assessee had not availed any credit on the plant and machinery in question, and the assets were acquired prior to the introduction of Modvat credit on capital goods. In those circumstances, no presumption of credit could be drawn. The Tribunal also noted that the goods had been used for more than 10 years and that the impugned demand was not sustainable on the facts found.
Conclusion: The duty demand was not payable and the Revenue appeals were liable to be dismissed.