Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit was admissible on structural steel items and welding electrodes used in fabrication of capital goods within the factory.
Analysis: The dispute was decided by applying the user test to determine whether the goods were used in or in relation to manufacture and whether they qualified as capital goods or inputs under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The amendment introduced by Notification No. 16/2009-CE(NT) dated 07.07.2009 was held not to govern the period in dispute, which was prior to the amendment. Relying on the Supreme Court's exposition of the user test and treating the steel items as used for fabrication of capital goods, the credit on structural steel items was held admissible. For welding electrodes, the reasoning was supported by High Court decisions recognizing such credit when the electrodes are used in fabrication within the factory.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on both structural steel items and welding electrodes was held admissible in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The denial of credit and the consequential penalty were set aside, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in the fabrication of capital goods within the factory are eligible for cenvat credit when they satisfy the user test and fall within the definition of inputs or capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the relevant period.