Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the filter khaini sachets packed in a larger pouch were liable to duty under the compounded levy scheme as notified goods, or only under the normal provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The goods in question were small sachets without any brand name, MRP, warnings, or manufacturer particulars, and were placed manually in a larger printed pouch that was sealed thereafter. The larger pouch was treated as the final container, while the sachets inside were not independently marketable in the condition in which they emerged from the packing process. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that such inner sachets, though packed with the aid of a machine, do not by themselves answer the description of notified goods for the purposes of the compounded levy scheme. The applicable approach was therefore to assess duty under the normal excise provisions rather than under the special capacity-based scheme.
Conclusion: The filter khaini sachets were not liable to duty under the compounded levy scheme and were to be assessed under the normal provisions of law.