Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal on service tax for Business Auxiliary Service.

The Tribunal upheld the Order in Appeal, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the demand for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. It was determined that the activities of the assessee did not qualify them as a commission agent under Section 65(105)(zzb)(Clause VII) of the Act, as the services provided were not directly related to the sale or purchase of goods or services for clients. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal emphasized that the consideration received by the assessee was not tied to the sale of products or services, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues:
- Appeal against the Order in Appeal dated 15.12.2011 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside the demand for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service.
- Determination of whether the activities of the assessee fall within the definition of a commission agent as per Section 65(105)(zzb)(Clause VII) of the Act.
- Interpretation of the definition of commission agent and its applicability to the case.
- Comparison of the activities of the assessee with the definition of commission agent.
- Analysis of relevant case laws to support the argument.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the Order in Appeal that set aside the demand for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS). The demand was raised based on the commission/brokerage charges received by the assessee from clients for providing discounting advice and arranging funds. The Revenue contended that the assessee acted as a commission agent and should be liable for service tax. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the consideration received by the assessee was not related to the activities of a commission agent as defined under the Act.

During the hearing, the Departmental Representative supported the original authority's view, while the assessee's advocate argued that the activities did not fall within the definition of a commission agent as per Section 65(105)(zzb)(Clause VII) of the Act. The assessee also cited relevant case laws to support their position.

The definition of a commission agent includes a person who acts on behalf of another in causing the sale or purchase of goods or services, involving dealing with goods or services, collecting payments, guarantees for collection or payment, or undertaking activities related to sale or purchase. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the assessee, involving advice on finding funds and negotiating arrangements, did not relate to the goods or services of the clients, thus not meeting the criteria of a commission agent.

The Tribunal referred to the case law of Fulchand Tikamchand Vs. CCE, Nagpur, where it was held that activities similar to those of the assessee did not classify the appellant as a commission agent. The Tribunal emphasized that the consideration received by the appellant was not connected to the sale of a product or service, which is a requirement for falling under the definition of a commission agent. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

---