Deemed export turnover and input service eligibility under Rule 5 were recognised, with refund remanded for verification.

Deemed export turnover from clearances between two 100% EOUs was treated at par with physical exports for refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The disputed services, including legal consultancy and erection, commissioning and installation, were recognised as input services, while management, maintenance and repair and project management consultancy required supporting documents for business nexus verification and fresh quantification. The refund dispute was therefore allowed in part and remanded for reconsideration with permission to furnish records.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether clearances from one 100% EOU to another 100% EOU are to be treated at par with physical exports for refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004; (ii) Whether the disputed input services were eligible as input services and, if so, whether further documents were required for quantification of refund.

Issue (i): Whether clearances from one 100% EOU to another 100% EOU are to be treated at par with physical exports for refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis: Refund under Rule 5 is linked to export turnover. The claim based on inter-unit transfers to another 100% EOU was accepted in principle as deemed export, and the matter was not finally rejected on the legal character of such clearances.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee, with deemed exports treated at par with physical exports for refund purposes.

Issue (ii): Whether the disputed input services were eligible as input services and, if so, whether further documents were required for quantification of refund.

Analysis: Legal consultancy service, erection, commissioning and installation service, and the other disputed services were held to fall within the scope of input service. For management, maintenance and repair service and project management consultancy service, the assessee was required to produce supporting documents before the original authority for proper quantification and verification of business nexus.

Conclusion: The issue was substantially decided in favour of the assessee, with remand directed for production of documents and fresh quantification.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded in part and the refund dispute was sent back for reconsideration and quantification after permitting the assessee to furnish supporting records.

Ratio Decidendi: For refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, deemed export turnover may be treated on par with physical export turnover, and eligible input services must be assessed on their business nexus while permitting verification through supporting documents at the quantification stage.

---