TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether defective fans, when dismantled and stored as separate parts, retained their identity as fans for central excise purposes. (ii) Whether reassembly of dismantled fan parts after replacement of defective components amounted to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Issue (i): Whether defective fans, when dismantled and stored as separate parts, retained their identity as fans for central excise purposes.
Analysis: Once the fans were dismantled into separate parts and the parts were stored in heaps, the original article ceased to exist in identifiable form. The dismantled components could no longer be independently recognised as fans.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether reassembly of dismantled fan parts after replacement of defective components amounted to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: Reassembling the fans after removing defective parts and replacing them with new parts, while reusing the workable components, amounted only to repair and service. Such activity did not bring into existence a new product so as to constitute manufacture.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, with the activity in question held to be repair and not manufacture, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Dismantling an article destroys its identifiable identity, and reassembly with replacement of defective parts for restoring the article to working condition, without emergence of a new product, does not amount to manufacture.
TaxTMI 
