Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2016 (11) TMI 402 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal sets aside duty demand and penalty due to no suppression of fact by appellant The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for duty for more than one year and the penalty under Section 11AC due to the absence ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal sets aside duty demand and penalty due to no suppression of fact by appellant

                            The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for duty for more than one year and the penalty under Section 11AC due to the absence of suppression of fact or mis-declaration by the appellant regarding the classification of the products. The Tribunal found that despite the differences in product names, the nature of the products remained the same, and the Department was aware of this fact, leading to the conclusion that there was no suppression of fact on the part of the appellant.




                            Issues:
                            Classification of products under different sub-headings and rates of duty - Suppression of facts and mis-declaration for duty evasion - Applicability of extended period for demand and penalty under Section 11AC.

                            Classification of Products:
                            The issue revolved around the classification of products, namely Knorr Annapurna 4 O'Clock Tiffin variants, where the appellant claimed classification under Sub-heading 0903.10 with Nil rate of duty, while the Department proposed classification under Sub-heading 2108.99 with duty chargeable at 16%. The appellant relied on a previous Tribunal judgment in Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur [2007 (212) ELT 141 (Tri.-Mumbai)] to support their classification claim. The appellant contended that as the issue had attained finality in the previous case, the demand for classification for the subsequent period was not sustainable. The appellant argued that there was no suppression of fact as they had informed the Department about the intended manufacture of the products and had submitted the product labels, indicating their classification under Sub-heading 0903.10. The Tribunal found that despite the different product names, the nature of the products remained the same as in the earlier case, and the Department was aware of this fact. Therefore, the Tribunal held that there was no suppression of fact on the part of the appellant, and the demand for duty for more than one year and penalty under Section 11AC were not sustainable.

                            Suppression of Facts and Mis-declaration:
                            The appellant argued that the show-cause notice for the subsequent period could not be issued invoking the extended period or alleging suppression of fact under the proviso to Section 11A. They contended that they had informed the Department about the product classification and, therefore, there was no suppression of fact on their part. The Department, on the other hand, claimed that the suffix in the product name differentiated it from the earlier case, justifying the demand for the extended period and penalty under Section 11AC. The Tribunal, after considering both arguments, found that the product nature remained the same, and the appellant had informed the Department about the product manufacture, indicating no suppression of fact. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the demand for duty for more than one year and the penalty under Section 11AC were not imposable.

                            Applicability of Extended Period and Penalty under Section 11AC:
                            The Department contended that the suffix in the product name differentiated the present case from the earlier Tribunal judgment, justifying the demand for the extended period and penalty under Section 11AC. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that despite the product name suffix, the nature of the products remained the same, and the Department was aware of this fact. The Tribunal held that there was no suppression of fact or mis-declaration by the appellant, and thus, the demand for duty for more than one year and penalty under Section 11AC were set aside. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to re-quantify the duty as per the order and recover any amount due from the appellant.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for duty for more than one year and the penalty under Section 11AC due to the absence of suppression of fact or mis-declaration by the appellant regarding the classification of the products.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found