Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land sold by the assessee was agricultural land outside the scope of capital asset so that the surplus on sale was not chargeable as long-term capital gains.
Analysis: The land was found to be situated in village Juchandra, beyond 8 km from the notified municipal limits and, on the relevant dates, outside the jurisdiction of the proposed municipal corporation. The record showed that the village retained a separate rural status during the year of sale, and the later final notification bringing it within the urban area took effect only subsequently. On these facts, the land could not be treated as a capital asset; the surrounding agricultural character and revenue records also supported that conclusion.
Conclusion: The land sold was agricultural land and not a capital asset under section 2(14); the addition treating the sale proceeds as taxable long-term capital gains was not justified, to that extent in favour of the assessee.