Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal interprets 'manufacture' broadly in duty foregone case for copper cable scrap</h1> <h3>M/s. D.S. Exports Versus C.C.E. Jaipur</h3> The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and allowed the appeal by the appellant, a 100% E.O.U., in a case concerning the ... Demand of custom duty along with interest and penalty - 100% EOU - import of Copper Cable Scrap - export of Recycled Mixed Copper Scrap - whether the process undertaken by the appellant can be termed as recycled scrap so as to avoid levy of duty, interest and penalty? - Held that: - CBEC vide Circular No.314/30/97-CX, dated 06.05.1997 in the context of manufacture in Notification No.1/95-CE in respect of galvanisation of black MS pipes by 100% EOUs clarified that a broader view is called for in respect of the interpretation of the provisions of Notification No.1/95-CE and the exemption may not be restricted only to cases where manufacture under section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act is involved. It is clarified that the exemption under Notification No.1/95-CE will also be applicable to a 100% EOU engaged in galvanising of black MS pipes. The definition of manufacture in the policy which has a wide range - the process can be termed as recycled scrap - demand of duty, interest and penalty not justified - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:- Interpretation of the term 'manufacture' in the context of duty foregone on imported copper cable scrap by a 100% E.O.U.- Applicability of Circular No. 314/30/97-CX and Notification No. 1/95-CE to the case.- Consideration of the definition of 'recycle' and manufacturing processes in the Exim Policy.- Assessment of the Commissioner (Appeals) decision based on dictionary meaning versus broader views on manufacturing.Analysis:The case involved the appellant, a 100% E.O.U., importing duty-free used copper cable scrap and exporting Recycled Mixed Copper Scrap, leading to a demand for customs duty of Rs. 10,70,627/-, interest, and a penalty. The appellant claimed the process undertaken was manufacturing, involving shearing, peeling, and other processes. The Tribunal noted the definition of manufacture under the Exim Policy, which includes a wide range of processes beyond traditional manufacturing. Additionally, Circular No. 314/30/97-CX clarified that exemptions for 100% EOUs are not limited to cases falling under the Central Excise Act's definition of manufacture.The Tribunal considered a Ministry of Commerce letter stating that the process mentioned in the Letter of Permission (LOP) falls within the definition of manufacturing as per the Exim Policy. The meaning of 'recycle' was also highlighted as treating used items for reuse. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision, based mainly on dictionary meaning, was overturned by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the broader view of manufacturing clarified by the CBEC and the Ministry of Commerce's stance, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order.In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision focused on the expansive definition of manufacturing under the Exim Policy, considering the processes undertaken by the appellant as falling within this definition. The case highlights the importance of interpreting legal terms in line with policy directives and broader industry practices rather than solely relying on dictionary definitions.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found