Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 108/95-CE dated 28.08.1995 in respect of clearances made to UNICEF-assisted projects, and whether the certificates issued by UNICEF officials were sufficient to establish eligibility.
Analysis: The notification, as amended by Notification No. 40/99-CE dated 02.11.1999, exempts goods supplied to organisations listed in the annexure when the supplies are meant for projects approved by the Government of India and financed by such organisations, provided the organisation certifies that the goods are intended for such use. The record contained purchase orders, delivery instructions and certificates issued by UNICEF procurement showing that the goods were ordered by UNICEF for use in UNICEF-assisted projects. On that basis, the required factual foundation for the exemption was satisfied, and the view that only a certificate from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary was required was held to be a reading of the notification.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 108/95-CE for the clearances covered by the three show cause notices.