Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (10) TMI 351 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Invalid Reassessment Under Income Tax Act: Change of Opinion Without Failure to Disclose Facts The tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were invalid as they were initiated based on a change of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Invalid Reassessment Under Income Tax Act: Change of Opinion Without Failure to Disclose Facts

                          The tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were invalid as they were initiated based on a change of opinion without alleging any failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The tribunal canceled the order passed under Section 147, allowing the appeal of the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Whether the reassessment was initiated merely on a change of opinion.
                          3. Legality of the reassessment proceedings in light of the audit objections.
                          4. Merits of the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding excess freight charges.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of Reopening the Assessment under Section 147:
                          The assessee contested the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that the reassessment was invalid as it was initiated after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. According to the proviso to Section 147, reassessment after four years is permissible only if there is a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. The tribunal noted that the reasons recorded by the AO did not specify any failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. Thus, the initiation of reassessment proceedings was held invalid due to the absence of any allegation of failure to disclose material facts.

                          2. Reassessment Initiated on Change of Opinion:
                          The tribunal examined whether the reassessment was merely based on a change of opinion. The assessee argued that the facts regarding freight charges were available during the original assessment, and no new material had come into possession of the AO. The tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd., which held that reassessment based on a mere change of opinion is not permissible. The tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was indeed based on a change of opinion, as the reasons recorded did not indicate any new tangible material that came into the AO's possession after the original assessment.

                          3. Legality of Reassessment Proceedings in Light of Audit Objections:
                          The tribunal noted that the reasons recorded by the AO did not mention the audit objections. The tribunal emphasized that the validity of reassessment proceedings must be judged based on the reasons recorded by the AO and not on any extraneous material. The tribunal cited the Bombay High Court's decision in Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar, which held that reasons recorded by the AO should be clear, unambiguous, and self-explanatory. Since the reasons recorded did not refer to the audit objections, the tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid.

                          4. Merits of the Addition Made by the AO Regarding Excess Freight Charges:
                          The CIT(A) upheld the AO's addition of excess freight charges, which were based on the average sea freight rates available in the public domain. The CIT(A) noted that the assessee's Authorized Representative (AR) did not dispute the correctness of the rates adopted by the AO and even admitted that excess payments had been made. The CIT(A) rejected the assessee's argument that the excess payments should be allowed as business expenses under Section 37(1) of the Act, stating that any expenditure incurred for purposes that are an offense or prohibited by law is not allowable as a business expense. The tribunal, however, did not address the merits of this addition due to its conclusion that the reassessment proceedings were invalid.

                          Conclusion:
                          The tribunal concluded that the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 was invalid as it was based on a change of opinion and did not specify any failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. Consequently, the order passed under Section 147 was canceled. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found