Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Invalid Reassessment: AO's Addition Not Coherent with Reasons Recorded

        Income Tax Officer, Ward – 10 (1), Pune Versus M/s. Shri Vishwakalyan Jivraksha Pratishthan and Vica-Versa

        Income Tax Officer, Ward – 10 (1), Pune Versus M/s. Shri Vishwakalyan Jivraksha Pratishthan and Vica-Versa - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Validity of reassessment proceedings.
        2. Eligibility for deduction under section 57 of the Income Tax Act.
        3. Retrospective applicability of the amendment to section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act.
        4. Computation of income for a charitable trust not registered under section 12AA at the time of filing the return.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Validity of Reassessment Proceedings:
        The assessee challenged the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The AO issued a notice under section 148 on 22-03-2013, and the reasons for reopening were communicated to the assessee on 18-06-2013. The assessee filed objections, which were disposed of by the AO on 23-08-2013. The AO made an addition of Rs. 40,92,239/- on account of disallowance of deduction under section 57 of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the reassessment proceedings but deleted the addition on merits. The Tribunal observed that the reasons recorded for reopening were factually incorrect and the addition made by the AO was incoherent with the reasons recorded for issuing the notice under section 148. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jet Airways (I) Ltd. held that if the AO accepts that the income initially believed to have escaped assessment did not actually escape, he cannot independently assess some other income without issuing a fresh notice under section 148. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings were held to be invalid.

        2. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 57:
        The AO disallowed the deduction of Rs. 40,92,237/- claimed under section 57 of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted this addition, stating that voluntary contributions or donations do not fall under the category of 'Income' unless deemed so by section 12(1) of the Act. Even if exemption is not allowable due to non-registration under section 12AA, the income of the trust should be computed on a commercial basis, not under section 57. The Tribunal upheld this view, affirming the deletion of the addition made by the AO.

        3. Retrospective Applicability of the Amendment to Section 12A(2):
        The Tribunal considered whether the amendment to section 12A(2) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014, which inserted a proviso effective from 01-10-2014, was retrospective. The Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in SNDP Yogam Vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemption) held that the amendment was retrospective, providing relief to trusts that fulfilled substantive conditions under sections 11 to 13 but were not registered under section 12AA. The Kolkata Bench in Sree Sree Ramkrishna Samity Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax also held that the amendment should be construed as retrospective to prevent genuine hardship. The Tribunal agreed with these views, concluding that the amendment was indeed retrospective.

        4. Computation of Income for a Charitable Trust Not Registered under Section 12AA:
        The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) noted that voluntary contributions or donations are not inherently 'Income' unless deemed so by section 12(1). Even without registration under section 12AA, the income should be computed on a commercial basis. The Tribunal upheld this computation method, affirming that the income of the trust should not be computed under section 57 but on a commercial basis, as per the decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Programme for Community Organisation.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition made by the AO. It also allowed the assessee's cross-objection, declaring the reassessment proceedings invalid. The judgment emphasized the retrospective applicability of the amendment to section 12A(2) and the correct method for computing the income of a charitable trust not registered under section 12AA.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found