Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported paper cones used for winding cotton yarn in a 100% EOU were to be treated as raw materials so as to deny the benefit of Notification No. 8/97-CE dated 01.03.1997.
Analysis: The imported paper cones were shown to be packing materials, including by reference to the Ministry of Commerce's communication. The expression "raw materials" in the exemption notification could not be extended to cover packing materials. The paper cones were used only after manufacture of cotton yarn was complete, and the contemporaneous understanding of the assessee and the Government authorities treated them as packing materials distinct from raw materials. The departmental case was not supported by contrary evidence strong enough to dislodge the findings of the first appellate authority.
Conclusion: The paper cones were not raw materials, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 8/97-CE dated 01.03.1997. The Revenue's appeal failed.