Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inputs removed as such from the factory and transferred to a sister unit without any sale are to be valued under the captive consumption formula in Rule 8, or under the proviso to Rule 9 and, if necessary, Rule 11 of the valuation rules.
Analysis: The valuation circular distinguished between captive consumption within the same factory and removal of goods to a sister unit. It further noted that where inputs or capital goods on which credit has been taken are removed as such to a sister unit and no sale is involved, the situation is not one of captive consumption in the ordinary sense. In such a case, if no transaction value from independent sales is available, recourse is not to Rule 8 based on cost of production of goods not manufactured in the assessee's factory, but to the residuary Rule 11, with value determined by reasonable means consistent with the valuation scheme and Section 4. As the only removal here was transfer outside the factory to a sister unit and no sale was involved, the department's basis for insisting on Rule 8 was not accepted.
Conclusion: The valuation adopted by the department under Rule 8 was not applicable to the facts of the case, and the appellant succeeded on the issue.
Final Conclusion: The pre-deposit requirement was waived, recovery was stayed, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs taken on credit are removed as such to a sister unit without sale and no independent transaction value is available, valuation is to be determined under the residuary valuation mechanism on reasonable means, not by applying the captive consumption cost-based rule.