Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Supreme Court upholds 4% tax rate for iron and steel reinforcements, dismisses Karnataka's appeals</h1> <h3>Smt. B. Narasamma Versus Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes Karnataka & Another</h3> Smt. B. Narasamma Versus Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes Karnataka & Another - 2016 AIR 3778, 2016 (8) JT 73, 2016 (7) SCALE 685 Issues Involved:1. Rate of taxability of declared goods under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.2. Whether iron and steel reinforcements lose their character as declared goods when used in works contracts.3. Applicability of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, and Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.4. Interpretation of relevant constitutional and statutory provisions.5. Examination of previous judgments and their applicability.6. Specific case facts and their implications on taxability.Detailed Analysis:1. Rate of Taxability of Declared Goods:The primary issue revolves around the rate of taxability of declared goods, specifically iron and steel, under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The contention is whether these goods retain their character and are subject to a tax rate of 4% or if they can be taxed at a higher rate applicable to civil construction works.2. Character of Iron and Steel Reinforcements:The core question is whether iron and steel reinforcements used in buildings lose their identity as declared goods at the point of taxability, i.e., at the point of accretion in a works contract. The judgment concludes that iron and steel products, when used for reinforcement in cement concrete, do not lose their identity as declared goods. They remain the same goods at the point of taxability, and mere cutting and bending do not alter their character.3. Applicability of Karnataka Sales Tax Act and Karnataka Value Added Tax Act:The appeals are divided into two groups: one relating to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the other to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The judgment examines the relevant provisions of these Acts concerning the taxability of declared goods involved in works contracts.4. Interpretation of Constitutional and Statutory Provisions:The judgment discusses Article 286(3) of the Constitution, which imposes restrictions on the imposition of tax on declared goods, and Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, which limits the tax rate to 4%. The interpretation of these provisions is crucial in determining the taxability of iron and steel reinforcements.5. Examination of Previous Judgments:The judgment relies on two significant Supreme Court decisions: Builders' Assn. of India v. Union of India and Gannon Dunkerley and Co. v. State of Rajasthan. These cases establish that works contracts involving declared goods are subject to the restrictions of Article 286(3) and Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, meaning they can only be taxed at a single point and at a rate not exceeding 4%.6. Specific Case Facts:The judgment examines the factual scenario where iron and steel products are used in construction without undergoing any manufacturing process that changes their identity. The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's findings are cited, which describe the use of steel bars/rods in construction and conclude that these processes do not constitute manufacturing, and the goods retain their identity.Conclusion:The Supreme Court concludes that the declared goods in question, specifically iron and steel reinforcements, retain their character and are subject to a tax rate of 4%. The judgment sets aside the previous decisions against the assessees and affirms the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's detailed judgment favoring the assessees. The appeals by the State of Karnataka are dismissed, and the taxability of declared goods at the rate of 4% is upheld.Separate Judgment:In the case of M/s. Ananth Engineering Works v. State of Karnataka, the appeal is dismissed as the iron and steel goods were used in the manufacture of other goods (doors, window frames, grills) which were then used in works contracts, thus not qualifying for the tax exemption.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found