Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be imposed where the assessment results in an actual loss, by applying Explanation 4 to that provision.
Analysis: The assessment year was 1988-89. The question stood covered by the later larger-bench decision holding that the amendment brought by the Finance Act, 2002 to Explanation 4 is clarificatory in nature and applies even to assessment years prior to 1 April 2003. On that basis, penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is attracted even when the assessed figure is a loss.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was not right in deleting the penalty. The question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is clarificatory and applies to earlier assessment years, and penalty for concealment can be levied even where the assessed income results in a loss.