Tribunal allows appeal for interest on share capital in cooperative societies

The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the decision of the lower authorities. It held that provisions for interest on share capital in cooperative societies should be considered allowable deductions under the mercantile system of accounting. The tribunal emphasized the distinction between cooperative societies and companies regarding the treatment of share capital and highlighted that provisions aligning with the mercantile system and eventually paid are deductible business expenses. The order was pronounced on 27th July 2016, in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the disallowance of Rs. 23,97,359/- towards provision for interest on share capital.
2. Applicability of previous judgments in similar cases.
3. Treatment of share capital in cooperative societies versus companies.
4. Adherence to the mercantile system of accounting.
5. Interpretation of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning provisions and payments.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Disallowance of Rs. 23,97,359/- Towards Provision for Interest on Share Capital:
The assessee, a cooperative society engaged in banking, filed a return for the year declaring a total income of Rs. 14,47,977/-. During scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed Rs. 23,97,359/- debited in the P&L account as a provision for interest on share capital, bringing it to tax. The A.O. reasoned that under the Income Tax Act, 1961, there is no provision to allow a deduction for provisions for payments on interest on share capital unless it is a charge on profit or incurred to earn income. This decision was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].

2. Applicability of Previous Judgments in Similar Cases:
The assessee cited judgments from the ITAT Vishakhapatnam and Hyderabad benches in similar cases, arguing that the provision for interest on share capital should be allowed. However, the CIT(A) distinguished these cases, noting that they dealt with actual payments of interest on share capital rather than provisions. The CIT(A) maintained that only actual payments, not provisions, are allowable as deductions under the IT Act.

3. Treatment of Share Capital in Cooperative Societies Versus Companies:
The assessee argued that the nature of share capital in a cooperative society differs from that in a company. In cooperative societies, share capital is akin to borrowed capital, as members subscribe to shares not as a voluntary investment but to avail services. This share capital is refundable once the member repays their loan, unlike in companies where share capital is a non-refundable investment aimed at earning returns. The tribunal acknowledged this distinction, noting that in cooperative societies, share capital could be treated as borrowed capital, and thus, the provision for interest on it should be considered differently.

4. Adherence to the Mercantile System of Accounting:
The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, where business expenditures are accounted for in the year they are incurred, regardless of when they are paid. The tribunal agreed that under this system, provisions for expenses like interest on share capital, which are paid in subsequent years, should be allowed. The tribunal noted that the provision made for Rs. 23,97,359/- towards interest on share capital for the financial year 2008-09 was paid in the subsequent year, aligning with the mercantile system.

5. Interpretation of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Concerning Provisions and Payments:
The tribunal emphasized that the Income Tax Act allows deductions for business expenditures that are incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. It reiterated that provisions for expenses, like interest on share capital in cooperative societies, should be considered allowable deductions if they align with the mercantile system of accounting and are eventually paid. The tribunal also referenced the Coordinate Bench's decision in the case of DCIT Vs. Navbharat Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., which supported the view that interest paid on share capital reduces the interest collected by the society from its members and does not form part of the profit.

Conclusion:
The tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities, allowing the appeal of the assessee. It concluded that in the context of cooperative societies, share capital is akin to borrowed capital, and provisions for interest on such share capital should be allowable deductions under the mercantile system of accounting. The tribunal's decision was guided by previous judgments and the specific nature of cooperative societies' operations.

Order Pronounced:
The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 27th July 2016.

---