Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (7) TMI 974 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court overturns assessment jurisdiction transfer order citing lack of reasons and breach of natural justice The court set aside the order transferring the petitioner's assessment jurisdiction due to the lack of specific reasons in the notice and breach of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Court overturns assessment jurisdiction transfer order citing lack of reasons and breach of natural justice

                          The court set aside the order transferring the petitioner's assessment jurisdiction due to the lack of specific reasons in the notice and breach of natural justice principles. The petition was allowed and disposed of in favor of the petitioner.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Transfer of jurisdiction of the petitioner’s assessment.
                          2. Breach of principles of natural justice.
                          3. Adequacy of notice and reasons for transfer.
                          4. Compliance with Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Transfer of Jurisdiction of the Petitioner’s Assessment:
                          The petitioner challenged the order dated 30.12.2015 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad, which transferred the petitioner’s assessment from DCIT (Circle-2)(1)(1), Ahmedabad to ACIT (Central Circle), Moradabad (U.P.). The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, had its assessments initially processed in New Delhi until 2011 when it shifted its corporate office to Ahmedabad. Consequently, the jurisdiction for assessment was transferred to Ahmedabad, and pending appeals were also transferred upon the petitioner’s request. A search and seizure operation was conducted at the residential premises of the director of the petitioner company and at the corporate office and factory premises on 30-31/07/2015 by the Income Tax department’s investigation wing.

                          2. Breach of Principles of Natural Justice:
                          The petitioner argued that the notice issued by the Principal Commissioner lacked any reasons for the proposed transfer, thus breaching the principles of natural justice. The petitioner contended that without the necessary information and documents, and without a further hearing date, the ex-parte order of transfer was passed. The petitioner also highlighted the inconvenience and prejudice caused by transferring the assessment to Moradabad, which is nearly 700 kms away from Ahmedabad.

                          3. Adequacy of Notice and Reasons for Transfer:
                          The petitioner received a notice on 03.11.2015 indicating a hearing for the transfer of the case to Moradabad, but it did not specify the reasons for such transfer. The petitioner responded by seeking adjournment and further information, which was not provided. The Principal Commissioner’s final order did not address the petitioner’s objections adequately and failed to provide specific reasons for the transfer, merely stating that the transfer was for the sake of coordinated enquiries in search and seizure cases. The court emphasized that a notice must contain reasons for the proposed action to enable the noticee to respond effectively, as per the principles of natural justice.

                          4. Compliance with Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
                          Section 127 pertains to the power to transfer cases by the prescribed Revenue authorities. It mandates giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard and recording reasons for the transfer. The court noted that the requirement of hearing is now part of the statute and must be fulfilled. The court found that the notice issued by the Principal Commissioner did not meet the requirement of granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing as it did not contain any grounds for the proposed transfer, thus failing the test of granting reasonable opportunity.

                          The court referenced previous judgments, including the Bombay High Court’s decision in Shikshana Prasaraka Mandali vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, which emphasized the necessity of a notice containing reasons for the proposed action to comply with the Audi Alteram Partem Rule. The court also cited the case of Shree Ram Vessel Scrap P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, which upheld the requirement of indicating prima facie reasons for the transfer in the show cause notice.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court concluded that the impugned order dated 30.12.2015 was flawed due to the lack of specific reasons in the notice and the breach of principles of natural justice. Consequently, the order was set aside, and the petition was allowed and disposed of.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found