Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Writ Petition Dismissed: Customs Act Confiscation Upheld, Emphasizes Appeal Process</h1> <h3>Shri R.K. Angangbi Singh Versus The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Ner And Others</h3> The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the confiscation order under the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the availability of the alternative ... Maintainability of writ petition - availability of alternative remedy of appeal - Absolute confiscation of the articles in question i.e., gold biscuits weighing 4334.79 grams - The Commissioner has also ordered confiscation of other articles and has also imposed penalty on the persons found to be in possession of, or dealing with, the gold in question. - Held that:- exercise of writ jurisdiction in this matter is declined; and this writ petition stands dismissed. However, it is left open for the petitioner in taking recourse to appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Issues:1. Maintainability of writ petition under Article 226 challenging confiscation order under Customs Act, 1962.2. Availability of alternative remedy of appeal.3. Justification for entertaining the writ petition bypassing the appeal remedy.4. Commissioner's findings on the validity of proceedings under Sections 110, 111 of the Act of 1962.5. Jurisdictional error in Commissioner's order.6. Dismissal of the writ petition and direction to seek appropriate remedy.Issue 1: Maintainability of writ petition under Article 226:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original confiscating gold biscuits under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court queried the availability of alternative appeal remedy and the justification for entertaining the writ petition. The petitioner argued that the authority did not properly examine the validity of proceedings under Section 110 of the Act, seeking writ jurisdiction due to the onerous nature of the appeal remedy.Issue 2: Availability of alternative remedy of appeal:The Court noted that the petitioner had previously approached the Supreme Court through a Special Leave to Appeal petition, which was dismissed with liberty to raise all available grounds. The Commissioner had addressed the grounds raised by the petitioner, concluding that the Customs Officers rightly proceeded under the Act of 1962. The Court emphasized the importance of the appeal remedy and declined to entertain the writ petition.Issue 3: Justification for entertaining the writ petition:The Court found that the petitioner failed to establish a strong case for bypassing the appeal remedy. The Commissioner's order addressed the petitioner's concerns, and the matter was deemed suitable for consideration by the appropriate authority in accordance with the law. The Court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioner to seek the appropriate remedy.Issue 4: Commissioner's findings on validity of proceedings:The Commissioner specifically considered the grounds raised by the petitioner and examined the justification for proceeding under Sections 110, 111 of the Act of 1962. The Commissioner concluded that the gold biscuits were smuggled into India in contravention of the Act. The findings regarding the individuals involved in the possession and dealing with the gold were also addressed in the order.Issue 5: Jurisdictional error in Commissioner's order:The Court did not find any jurisdictional error in the Commissioner's order. It stated that the petitioner's contentions were adequately addressed by the Commissioner, and the decision was based on the evidence and material available. The Court emphasized that the appellate forum would be responsible for reviewing the Commissioner's findings on merits.Issue 6: Dismissal of the writ petition and direction to seek appropriate remedy:The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition. It directed the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the need for the concerned authority to handle the matter impartially and expeditiously once the petitioner seeks the appropriate remedy.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found