Strict documentary compliance governs duty rebate claims; photocopies of export papers are not enough under the rebate notification.

Rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Notification No. 19/2004-CE (N.T.) required strict compliance with the prescribed documentary procedure. The original ARE-1 and excise invoice had to be produced for verification to establish export of the duty-paid goods and satisfy the conditions of the rebate notification. Photocopies were not treated as adequate compliance, and general procedural leniency could not override the mandatory documentary requirements. On that basis, the rebate claim was held inadmissible and rejection of the claim was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Notification No. 19/2004-CE (N.T.) dated 06.09.2004 could be sanctioned on the basis of photocopies of ARE-1 and excise invoices instead of the original documents.

Analysis: The rebate scheme required compliance with the procedure prescribed in the notification, including production of the original ARE-1 and excise invoice for verification by the sanctioning authority. The documents were essential to establish export of the same duty-paid goods and to satisfy the conditions attached to the conditional rebate notification. The use of photocopies did not satisfy the prescribed evidentiary and procedural requirements, and the claimed relaxation could not override the mandatory conditions of the notification. The reliance on general procedural leniency and on other cases was distinguished on facts and did not dilute the requirement of strict compliance.

Conclusion: The rebate claim on the basis of photocopies was not admissible, and the rejection of the claim was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The revision application failed because the claimant did not fulfil the mandatory documentary conditions for rebate under the governing notification and rules.

Ratio Decidendi: A rebate claim under a conditional exemption or rebate notification must be supported by the documents specifically prescribed by the notification, and non-compliance with those mandatory documentary conditions renders the claim inadmissible.

---