1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Karnataka HC affirms ITAT decision: Belated EPF payment not taxable income</h1> The Karnataka HC dismissed Revenue's appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act against the ITAT's order. The court ruled that belated payment of ... Whether the appellate authorities were correct in holding that the belated payment of the employer’s contribution to provident fund beyond the stipulated period, cannot be treated as the income of the assessee under section 36(1) (va) read with section 2(24)(x) as held by the Assessing Officer in view of the amendment to section 43B – question is answered in favour of assessee and against revenue The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that belated payment of employer's contribution to provident fund cannot be treated as the income of the assessee under section 36(1)(va) and section 2(24)(x) of the Act, based on previous Division Bench judgments. The appeal was dismissed as the question had already been answered in favor of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
