2016 (7) TMI 576 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal upholds revaluation reserve inclusion in book profits for MAT, interest & penalty imposed

Infibeam Incorporation Ltd. Versus The ITO Ward-4 (3), Ahmedabad

Infibeam Incorporation Ltd. Versus The ITO Ward-4 (3), Ahmedabad - TMI Issues Involved:1. Adjustment of 'book profit' under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.2. Levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D of the Income Tax Act.3. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Adjustment of 'Book Profit' under Section 115JB:The primary issue in this case was whether the revaluation of investments and the subsequent creation of a revaluation reserve should be included in the book profits for the purpose of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Assessee had revalued its investment in its subsidiary, NSI Infinium Global Pvt Ltd, from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 20.01 crores, creating a revaluation reserve of Rs. 20 crores. Out of this reserve, Rs. 19,52,64,900 was used to issue bonus shares to its shareholders. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that the revaluation reserve should have been routed through the Profit and Loss Account instead of directly crediting it to the Reserves and Surplus account in the Balance Sheet. The AO recast the Profit and Loss account by including the revaluation reserve to the profits for determining book profits under section 115JB, resulting in book profits of Rs. 19,99,79,887.The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the revaluation reserve was not in line with Accounting Standard 11 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and the circular issued by the Department of Company Affairs. The CIT(A) emphasized that the revaluation reserve should have been included in the Profit and Loss account as per the Companies Act and Accounting Standards. The CIT(A) also noted that the revaluation reserve was used for issuing bonus shares, indicating that the Assessee treated it as a free reserve, which was not permissible.The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) and AO, stating that the Assessee's act of issuing bonus shares out of the revaluation reserve indicated that the reserve was considered as available for distribution, contradicting the Assessee's claim that it was not a real profit. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee's argument that only realized gains should be considered for taxation, highlighting that the Assessee's actions suggested otherwise.2. Levy of Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D:The Assessee contested the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal did not adjudicate this issue separately, as the primary issue regarding the adjustment of book profits was considered crucial and determinative. The Tribunal's decision to uphold the adjustment of book profits implicitly validated the levy of interest under these sections.3. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c):The Assessee also raised the issue of the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal did not specifically address this issue, as it was considered consequential to the primary issue of the adjustment of book profits. The Tribunal's decision to uphold the adjustment of book profits implied that the initiation of penalty proceedings was justified.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee's appeal, upholding the AO's and CIT(A)'s decision to include the revaluation reserve in the book profits for the purpose of MAT under section 115JB. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessee's actions of issuing bonus shares out of the revaluation reserve indicated that the reserve was considered available for distribution, contradicting the Assessee's claim that it was not a real profit. Consequently, the Tribunal also upheld the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D, and the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c).