Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was sustainable in respect of interest payments already made, where the payees were stated to be exempt or otherwise not liable to tax and the assessee was not required to be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The amounts of interest had already been paid and the disallowance provision was treated as applicable only to sums remaining payable. The proviso to section 40(a)(ia) was applied to hold that where the assessee is not deemed to be in default under section 201(1), the tax is to be deemed deducted and paid for the purpose of that disallowance. The payees were also shown, on the record, to be mostly exempt entities or recipients in whose hands tax was not attracted, and the appellate authorities relied on the binding effect of the jurisdictional precedent on the issue.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not justified and the deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 40(a)(ia) cannot be invoked to disallow interest already paid where the assessee is not liable to be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1), particularly when the recipients are not chargeable to tax.