Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the yarn manufactured by the appellant was classifiable as single yarn with Lycra as the core under sub-heading 5205.11 or under sub-heading 5205.90.
Analysis: The manufacturing process showed that cotton roving and Lycra filament came out as a single yarn with Lycra as the core. The issue had already been decided on the same material in an earlier Tribunal decision, which held that such goods fall under sub-heading 5205.11. Following judicial discipline, the Tribunal declined to take a different view.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under sub-heading 5205.11 and not under sub-heading 5205.90, against the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Core spun yarn in which the drafted cotton roving and Lycra filament emerge as a single yarn with Lycra as the core is classifiable under sub-heading 5205.11, and a later bench must follow the earlier coordinate decision on the same issue.