Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee on Various Grounds</h1> <h3>M/s. Foods and Inns Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle 10 (2), Mumbai And Vice-Versa</h3> M/s. Foods and Inns Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle 10 (2), Mumbai And Vice-Versa - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.2. Disallowance of Corporate Club Membership Fee.3. Foreign Exchange Losses.4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:For A.Y. 2007-08:The assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs. 46,655/- and claimed no expenditure was incurred. The AO invoked Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D and disallowed Rs. 15,38,089/-, which was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000/- by the CIT(A) on an adhoc basis. The Tribunal noted that a Coordinate Bench had already restored this issue to the AO for fresh examination, and thus, without rendering a finding on the merits, it restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication. Consequently, the assessee’s appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.For A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11:The assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs. 41,126/- and Rs. 40,003/- respectively. The AO disallowed Rs. 18,86,195/- for A.Y. 2009-10 and Rs. 17,38,275/- for A.Y. 2010-11. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to Rs. 1,07,754/- for A.Y. 2009-10 and 0.5% of average investments for A.Y. 2010-11. The Tribunal, following the decisions of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Empire Package P. Ltd. and the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Deepak Mittal, held that the disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income and restored the matter to the AO for fresh examination. Consequently, the assessee’s CO for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 and Revenue’s ground for A.Y. 2010-11 were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.2. Disallowance of Corporate Club Membership Fee for A.Y. 2009-10:The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,00,000/- for Corporate Club Membership fees. The Tribunal, following the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in CIT, Bangalore vs. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd., held that the expenditure on club membership fees for employees is admissible as business expenditure. Consequently, the CO’s ground for A.Y. 2009-10 was allowed.3. Foreign Exchange Losses:For A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11:The AO disallowed foreign exchange losses of Rs. 16,72,85,011/- for A.Y. 2009-10 and Rs. 6,53,06,057/- for A.Y. 2010-11 as speculative losses. The CIT(A) held these losses as business expenditure, not speculation losses. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A), noting that the assessee entered into forward contracts to hedge against foreign exchange losses on export sales proceeds, which were not speculative in nature. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, confirming these losses as business losses. Consequently, Revenue’s grounds for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 were dismissed.4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for A.Y. 2009-10:The AO disallowed Rs. 10,04,650/- for non-payment of TDS before the end of the financial year. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, following the decision of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in CIT vs. Virgin Creations, which held that TDS paid before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1) is allowable. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, dismissing Revenue’s ground for A.Y. 2009-10.Conclusion:- Assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2007-08 is allowed for statistical purposes.- Revenue’s appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 are partly allowed for statistical purposes.- Assessee’s CO for A.Y. 2009-10 is partly allowed.- Assessee’s CO for A.Y. 2010-11 is partly allowed for statistical purposes.Order pronounced in the open court on 7th June, 2016.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found