Tax Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee on Various Grounds

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2007-08 for statistical purposes. The Revenue's appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The assessee's challenge regarding the disallowance of Corporate Club Membership Fee for A.Y. 2009-10 was allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld foreign exchange losses as business losses for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for A.Y. 2009-10 was deleted. The overall outcome favored the assessee on various grounds, with some adjustments made for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.
2. Disallowance of Corporate Club Membership Fee.
3. Foreign Exchange Losses.
4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:

For A.Y. 2007-08:
The assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs. 46,655/- and claimed no expenditure was incurred. The AO invoked Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D and disallowed Rs. 15,38,089/-, which was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000/- by the CIT(A) on an adhoc basis. The Tribunal noted that a Coordinate Bench had already restored this issue to the AO for fresh examination, and thus, without rendering a finding on the merits, it restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication. Consequently, the assessee’s appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

For A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11:
The assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs. 41,126/- and Rs. 40,003/- respectively. The AO disallowed Rs. 18,86,195/- for A.Y. 2009-10 and Rs. 17,38,275/- for A.Y. 2010-11. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to Rs. 1,07,754/- for A.Y. 2009-10 and 0.5% of average investments for A.Y. 2010-11. The Tribunal, following the decisions of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Empire Package P. Ltd. and the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Deepak Mittal, held that the disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income and restored the matter to the AO for fresh examination. Consequently, the assessee’s CO for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 and Revenue’s ground for A.Y. 2010-11 were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

2. Disallowance of Corporate Club Membership Fee for A.Y. 2009-10:
The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,00,000/- for Corporate Club Membership fees. The Tribunal, following the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in CIT, Bangalore vs. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd., held that the expenditure on club membership fees for employees is admissible as business expenditure. Consequently, the CO’s ground for A.Y. 2009-10 was allowed.

3. Foreign Exchange Losses:

For A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11:
The AO disallowed foreign exchange losses of Rs. 16,72,85,011/- for A.Y. 2009-10 and Rs. 6,53,06,057/- for A.Y. 2010-11 as speculative losses. The CIT(A) held these losses as business expenditure, not speculation losses. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A), noting that the assessee entered into forward contracts to hedge against foreign exchange losses on export sales proceeds, which were not speculative in nature. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, confirming these losses as business losses. Consequently, Revenue’s grounds for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 were dismissed.

4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for A.Y. 2009-10:
The AO disallowed Rs. 10,04,650/- for non-payment of TDS before the end of the financial year. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, following the decision of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in CIT vs. Virgin Creations, which held that TDS paid before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1) is allowable. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, dismissing Revenue’s ground for A.Y. 2009-10.

Conclusion:
- Assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2007-08 is allowed for statistical purposes.
- Revenue’s appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 are partly allowed for statistical purposes.
- Assessee’s CO for A.Y. 2009-10 is partly allowed.
- Assessee’s CO for A.Y. 2010-11 is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 7th June, 2016.

---