Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (5) TMI 1134 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Provision for Non-Performing Assets not same as bad debts under Income Tax Act The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, ruling that the provision for Non-Performing Assets (NPA) cannot be equated with the provision for bad and ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Provision for Non-Performing Assets not same as bad debts under Income Tax Act

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, ruling that the provision for Non-Performing Assets (NPA) cannot be equated with the provision for bad and doubtful debts under section 36(1)(viia)(b) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was dismissed as they failed to establish that the provision made was for bad and doubtful debts as required by the Act. The order was pronounced on May 6, 2016, in Chennai.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 42,36,327/- representing the provision for bad and doubtful debts under section 36(1)(viia)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Confirmation of Disallowance of Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts

                            Background:
                            The appellant, a branch of a foreign bank, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], which sustained the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 36(1)(viia)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 42,36,327/-. The primary contention was whether the provision for Non-Performing Assets (NPA) could be equated with the provision for bad and doubtful debts.

                            Provisions of Section 36(1)(viia):
                            Section 36(1)(viia) provides for deductions in respect of provisions for bad and doubtful debts made by banks. Specifically, clause (b) allows a deduction for foreign banks up to 5% of the total income before making any deductions under this clause and Chapter VIA.

                            Assessing Officer's (AO) Stand:
                            The AO observed that the appellant did not create any provision for bad and doubtful debts as required under section 36(1)(viia)(b). The appellant argued that the provision was made in compliance with Reserve Bank of India (RBI) norms, but the AO rejected this argument, stating that these norms apply only to banks incorporated in India.

                            CIT(A)'s Observations:
                            The CIT(A) noted that the appellant claimed both the actual bad debt written off and the provision for bad and doubtful debts, which was contradictory. The CIT(A) emphasized that the provision for NPA cannot be equated with the provision for bad and doubtful debts, as they serve different purposes.

                            Tribunal's Analysis:
                            The Tribunal analyzed the statutory provisions and legislative history of section 36(1)(viia). It was noted that the provision for NPA is not the same as the provision for bad and doubtful debts. The Tribunal referenced several judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Southern Technologies Ltd. vs. JCIT, which clarified that RBI directions do not override the provisions of the Income Tax Act.

                            Quantum of Deduction:
                            The Tribunal observed that the appellant had made a provision of only Rs. 20,17,436/- under the head provisions for NPA, which was significantly less than the claimed amount of Rs. 42,36,327/-. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant failed to establish that the provision was made for bad and doubtful debts as required under the Act.

                            RBI's Directives:
                            The appellant argued that the provision for NPA was made in compliance with RBI's IRAC norms. However, the Tribunal held that RBI guidelines are for financial reporting purposes and do not determine the taxable income under the Income Tax Act.

                            Proviso to Section 36(1)(vii):
                            The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. vs. CIT, which held that the provisions of sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are distinct and operate in their respective fields. The proviso to section 36(1)(vii) limits the deduction to the extent of the difference between the debt written off and the provision made under section 36(1)(viia).

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the provision for NPA cannot be equated with the provision for bad and doubtful debts. Consequently, the appellant was not entitled to the claimed deduction under section 36(1)(viia)(b). The appeal was dismissed.

                            Final Order:
                            The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on the 6th of May, 2016 at Chennai.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found