Validity of notice under section 148 upheld, additions confirmed for seized cash and stock. Appellant's appeal dismissed.

The ITAT Pune upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and confirmed the additions made on account of seized cash and stock under section 147. The tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Addition of seized cash and stock under section 147 of the Act.

Issue 1: Validity of notice under section 148:
The appeal challenged the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Act, questioning the jurisdiction of the reassessment under section 147. The appellant argued that the notice was without jurisdiction and should be quashed. The appellant contended that the proper statutory procedures were not followed, rendering the assessment illegal. The appellant insisted that sections 153A and 153C should have been invoked due to the involvement of the police department in seizing the cash. However, the Assessing Officer proceeded with the reassessment under section 147 based on the information received regarding the seized cash and stock.

Issue 2: Addition of seized cash and stock under section 147:
The Assessing Officer made additions to the appellant's income on account of seized cash and stock found during a police raid. The appellant claimed the cash was from agricultural income and loans, but failed to provide concrete evidence to support this claim. The appellant's explanations regarding the sources of income were rejected by the Assessing Officer, who found discrepancies and lack of evidence in the appellant's statements and documents. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, noting that the appellant had fabricated documents and failed to substantiate the sources of income claimed. The CIT(A) concluded that the cash was from the unauthorized sale of liquor and confirmed the additions in the appellant's income.

In summary, the ITAT Pune dismissed the appeal, upholding the validity of the notice issued under section 148 and confirming the additions made on account of seized cash and stock under section 147. The tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---