High Court sets aside Tribunal orders due to lack of proper notice service under Section 37C

The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and Commissioner as there was no evidence of proper service of notice under Section 37 C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal must ensure actual delivery or tendering of the notice before deeming it served, contrary to the respondent's argument that service by post is sufficient. The case was remanded for further adjudication by the Appellate Authority, directing the appellant to appear before the Commissioner for a fair review of the service issue.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of service of notice under Section 37 C of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis:
The High Court examined the substantial question of law regarding the justification of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal accepting the service of an order dated 21.12.2010 upon the appellant, despite lack of evidence regarding the proper service under Section 37 C of the Act. The appellant contended that there was no material available to prove the service of the notice. The respondent argued that as per Section 37 C, service is deemed to have been effected when the notice is sent by post. However, the Court disagreed with the respondent's stance, emphasizing that the Tribunal must ensure the delivery or tendering of the notice before presuming it was served, as per sub-section (2) of Section 37 C. Since no such satisfaction was recorded by the Tribunal, the appeal was allowed, and the orders passed by the Tribunal and the Commissioner were set aside.

The High Court held that it is mandatory for the Tribunal to ascertain the proper delivery or tendering of the notice before assuming it was served, as prescribed under sub-section (2) of Section 37 C of the Act. The Court noted the absence of prima facie satisfaction by the Tribunal regarding the service of the notice, leading to the decision that the appeal should be accepted. Consequently, the orders issued by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and the Commissioner were overturned. The case was remanded for further adjudication on its merits by the Appellate Authority, directing the appellant to appear before the Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise (Appeals-I), Jaipur, on a specified date, subject to a deposit requirement. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, ensuring a fair and thorough review of the service issue under the Central Excise Act, 1944.

---