1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court affirms deduction for industrial unit under Sections 80HH & 80-I, emphasizing consistency in benefit grant</h1> The Rajasthan High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I for an industrial unit, emphasizing the ... Industrial unit – claim for deduction under section 80HH and 80-I - such deduction was never denied to the assessee in the earlier assessment years - principle of consistency requires, that the view taken by the Department in the preceding years should not be disturbed, unless there is a change in the factual and legal position – since deduction was given in previous year, deduction is allowed to assessee Issues:- Entitlement to claim deduction under section 80HH and section 80-I for an industrial unit.Analysis:1. The appeal before the Rajasthan High Court involved the question of whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under both section 80HH and section 80-I in relation to the industrial unit operated by them. The Tribunal had relied on judgments from the Rajasthan High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court to support its decision.2. The Court examined the judgment in C.I.T. Vs. Chokshi Contacts P. Ltd. and noted that it fully addressed the controversy in the present case. The appellant's counsel argued that since the factory began production after 1.4.1990, deduction under section 80HH could not be claimed. However, the Commissioner had found that manufacturing of quick lime started before 1.4.1990, and production of hydrated lime commenced after that date. The Tribunal, considering the principle of consistency, upheld the deduction under section 80HH as it had been allowed in previous assessment years.3. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's reasoning, emphasizing that the Department had consistently granted the benefit of section 80HH to the assessee. Therefore, the contention that the benefit was not available in this case was rejected. The Court concluded that the issue was settled by the judgment in Chokshi Contacts' case against the Revenue, and accordingly, the appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
