1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
of Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
of Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
of Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
<h1>Court affirms Tribunal's decision on tax deduction under section 80-I, rules in favor of assessee.</h1> The Gujarat HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the ... Whether Tribunal is right in allowing deduction u/s 80-I – question, involved is no more res integra as it has been already decided in the case of the assessee himself that the Tribunal was right in allowing deduction u/s 80-I, as more than twenty persons were working under control of the assessee in the industrial undertaking of the assessee – in view of law laid down in the case of CIT v. Prithviraj Bhoorchand, question is answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee The Gujarat High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to allow deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Tribunal was correct in directing the Department to allow the deduction. The decision was based on the fact that more than twenty persons were working under the control of the assessee in the industrial undertaking. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
