1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Mumbai Admits Appeal Due to Penalty Amount Below Threshold</h1> The appeal was admitted by CESTAT MUMBAI as the penalty amount was below the threshold for refusal of admission. Shri Anthony Irineus Carneiro represented ... Admission of appeal - Amount involved is less than statutory limit of βΉ 2 lacs as per Second proviso to Section 35B(1) - Appellant submitted that it is a prima facie case in favour of the appellant therefore they may be given opportunity to argue their appeal on merit - Held that:- considering the submissions made by Ld. Consultant is satisfactory, the appeal is admitted. - Appeal admitted The appeal was admitted by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI as the penalty amount involved was Rs. 1,00,000, below the threshold of Rs. 2 lakhs for refusal of admission. Shri Anthony Irineus Carneiro, Consultant, argued for the appellant, and the appeal was admitted for further proceedings.