Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under the revisional power was barred by limitation under section 67(1)(a) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, and whether the period of limitation commenced from the date of the order or from the date of knowledge of the alleged irregularity.
Analysis: Section 67(1)(a) expressly provides that the Commissioner may act on his own motion within three years from the date of the order sought to be revised. The composition order was passed on 19.12.2000, whereas the revision notice was issued on 02.02.2005. The statutory language does not permit substitution of the date of knowledge for the date of the order. In a taxing statute, the language must be given effect as written and equitable considerations cannot extend a period of limitation fixed by the statute.
Conclusion: The revisional notice was time-barred. The finding that limitation commenced from the date of knowledge was incorrect, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.