Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Court should sanction the special resolution for reduction of share capital by cancelling the public shareholders' holding and whether such reduction was legally permissible in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The company had earlier been in liquidation and was later revived on the basis of a scheme under which a strategic investor infused funds and the creditors were paid. The preferential allotment made pursuant to the earlier corporate approvals was not found to be illegal, and it had changed the shareholding pattern so that the public shareholders retained only 5.47% of the paid-up capital. The Court found that the public shareholders would receive a value for their shares far above the then-existing per share value and that the resolution had been passed by an overwhelming majority. In these circumstances, and in view of the power to reduce capital contained in the articles, there was no legal impediment to the proposed reduction.
Conclusion: The reduction of share capital was sanctioned and the special resolution was approved.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, and the company was permitted to reduce its capital by cancelling the public shareholders' shares and to have the minute registered with the Registrar of Companies.
Ratio Decidendi: A court may sanction reduction of share capital where the reduction is authorized by the articles, approved by the requisite majority, and does not unfairly prejudice shareholders who are offered fair value for their shares.