TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Appeals Granted, Late Filing Fees Deleted for FY 2012-13</h1> <h3>Smt Anisha Shirishkumar Modi Versus The DCIT (TDS), CPC, Gaziabad</h3> Smt Anisha Shirishkumar Modi Versus The DCIT (TDS), CPC, Gaziabad - TMI Issues Involved:1. Wrongly charging late filing fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act for financial year 2012-13 (Quarter 2 and Quarter 3).2. Legality of levying late filing fees prior to the amendment effective from 01-06-2015.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Wrongly Charging Late Filing Fees Under Section 234E:The appellant contended that the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] erred in law and facts by levying late filing fees under Section 234E of Rs. 5,500/- for Quarter 2 and Rs. 9,375/- for Quarter 3 of the financial year 2012-13. The appellant argued that the Finance Act, 2015, which substituted clauses (c) to (e) of subsection (1) of Section 200A, became effective from 01-06-2015. Therefore, the appellant asserted that prior to this date, there was no provision enabling the levy of fees under Section 234E during the processing of TDS statements under Section 200A. The appellant cited various case laws supporting the position that no penalty could be levied under Section 234E before 01-06-2015, including decisions from the Amritsar Bench of the Tribunal and High Courts of Kerala, Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Bombay.2. Legality of Levying Late Filing Fees Prior to Amendment Effective from 01-06-2015:The Tribunal examined the relevant statutory provisions and amendments. Section 234E, inserted by the Finance Act 2012, effective from 01-07-2012, imposed a fee for defaults in furnishing TDS statements. Section 200A, as it stood before the amendment by Finance Act 2015, did not allow for the computation of fees under Section 234E during the processing of TDS statements. The Tribunal noted that the amendment effective from 01-06-2015 enabled such computation.The Tribunal referred to the decision of the ITAT Amritsar Bench in the case of Shibia Healthcare Private Limited vs. Dy. CIT (TDS), which held that adjustments for fees under Section 234E were beyond the permissible scope of Section 200A prior to 01-06-2015. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) should have examined the legality of the adjustment made under the intimation issued under Section 200A, which was not done. The Tribunal concluded that the levy of fees under Section 234E in the intimation issued before 01-06-2015 was unsustainable in law.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the A.O. to delete the late filing fees levied under Section 234E for both quarters of the financial year 2012-13. The Tribunal's decision was based on the legal position that, prior to the amendment effective from 01-06-2015, there was no enabling provision under Section 200A for levying fees under Section 234E. The Tribunal's order was pronounced on 10th February 2016 at Ahmedabad.
TaxTMI 