Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was leviable, or could be reduced, when the duty amount had already been deposited before issuance of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the effect of prior payment of duty before the show cause notice. The Court followed its earlier decision that once duty is deposited before issuance of the notice, there is no short levy subsisting on that date and proceedings for penalty under Section 11AC cannot be initiated or sustained. On that view, the further question whether an otherwise imposable penalty could be reduced below the duty amount ceased to be a substantial question of law.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 11AC was not sustainable in the facts of the case, and the appeal failed.