Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of excise duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2001 was rightly allowed on the ground that the loss of stored goods was attributable to natural causes or unavoidable accident.
Analysis: Rule 21 permits remission where goods are shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner to have been lost or destroyed by natural causes or by unavoidable accident, or to be unfit for consumption or marketing before removal. In the context of commercial storage and handling of large quantities of concentrates, the expressions "natural causes" and "unavoidable accident" require a reasonable and practical construction so that the remission provision is not rendered ineffective. The Tribunal recorded a factual satisfaction that the losses were reasonable, occurred in open storage and during handling, and that there was no tangible evidence of clandestine removal. The mere reference to accounting policy did not vitiate that factual finding.
Conclusion: The remission granted by the Tribunal was upheld and the challenge by the Revenue failed.