TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Ink Cartridges Classified as Machine Parts: Tribunal Rules in Favor of Appellant</h1> <h3>LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL (I) LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CUS. (SEA PORT) CHENNAI</h3> The Tribunal determined that 'Ink Cartridges with Print head assembly' imported by the Appellant are correctly classifiable under sub-heading 8473 30 50 ... Printer - Classification of “Ink Cartridges with Print head assembly” can be determined by classification of machines for which cartridges are used – if cartridges are meant for printers of CH 84.71, the same would be classifiable u/h 84.73 – if the machines for which these cartages are meant, are classifiable u/h 84.79, the same would be classifiable u/h 84.79 – held that Digital laser printer with high speed resolution and digital document scanner is correctly classifiable u/sh 8471.60 Issues:Classification of 'Ink Cartridges with Print head assembly' imported by the Appellant - whether classifiable as 'parts and accessory of the machines of heading 84.71' under sub-heading 8473 30 50 for concessional rate of duty under Notification No.21/02-Cus., or as 'Parts of Machines & mechanical appliances having individual functions-not specified or included in this Chapter' under sub-heading 8479 89 99 as claimed by the Revenue.Analysis:The dispute in the judgment revolves around the classification of 'Ink Cartridges with Print head assembly' imported by the Appellant. The Appellant argues that these goods should be classified under sub-heading 8473 30 50 as parts of machines under heading 84.71, eligible for a concessional rate of duty. On the other hand, the Revenue contends that the goods should be classified under sub-heading 8479 89 99 as parts of multifunctional printers under heading 84.79.The Appellant's representative argues that the imported goods are meant for multi-functional printers, which are classifiable under heading 84.71. They highlight that printing is the main function of these machines, making the ink cartridges parts of such printers classifiable under 84.73. Reference is made to Chapter Note 5 to Chapter 84 and a previous Tribunal judgment supporting this classification. It is emphasized that the ink cartridges are usable with both conventional and multifunctional printers, further supporting the classification under heading 84.73.The Revenue's representative counters by stating that the imported goods are intended for multifunctional printers, which function as standalone devices without a PC. Citing technical literature, they argue that multifunctional printers fall under heading 84.79, and therefore, the ink cartridges should be classified under sub-heading 8479 89 99. Reference is made to a Tribunal judgment supporting this classification based on a similar multifunction machine.After considering both arguments, the Tribunal concludes that the 'Ink Cartridges with Print head assembly' are correctly classifiable under sub-heading 8473 30 50. The decision is based on the fact that the imported cartridges can be used with both conventional and multifunctional printers, with some cartridges specifically designed for conventional printers only. The Tribunal also references a previous judgment upholding the classification of multifunction digital printers under sub-heading 8471.60, supporting the classification of the imported goods under heading 84.73.In light of the above analysis, the Tribunal sets aside the impugned order and allows the appeals in favor of the Appellant, determining the correct classification of the imported goods under sub-heading 8473 30 50 as parts of machines under heading 84.71.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
