1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Factory manager's admission leads to dismissal of appeal for removal of goods.</h1> The High Court Bombay upheld the order of CESTAT based on factory manager's statement admitting removal of goods clandestinely. Appellant's grievance ... Clandestine removal by adopting the modus operandi like issuance of invoices of lesser quantity and removal of scrap without payment of duty by not issuing any Central Excise document - it was obligatory on the part of the appellant to file an application to adduce additional evidence before the tribunal, which was not done by appellant β tribunal was justified in rejecting affidavit filed by appellant, and confirming the order of lower authority on basis of statement of factory manager The High Court Bombay upheld the order of CESTAT based on factory manager's statement admitting removal of goods clandestinely. Appellant's grievance regarding an unconsidered affidavit was rejected as no application for additional evidence was filed before the tribunal. The appeal was dismissed as no questions of law arose.