TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Factory manager's admission leads to dismissal of appeal for removal of goods.</h1> <h3>KAY IRON WORKS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE- II</h3> The High Court Bombay upheld the order of CESTAT based on factory manager's statement admitting removal of goods clandestinely. Appellant's grievance ... Clandestine removal by adopting the modus operandi like issuance of invoices of lesser quantity and removal of scrap without payment of duty by not issuing any Central Excise document - it was obligatory on the part of the appellant to file an application to adduce additional evidence before the tribunal, which was not done by appellant – tribunal was justified in rejecting affidavit filed by appellant, and confirming the order of lower authority on basis of statement of factory manager The High Court Bombay upheld the order of CESTAT based on factory manager's statement admitting removal of goods clandestinely. Appellant's grievance regarding an unconsidered affidavit was rejected as no application for additional evidence was filed before the tribunal. The appeal was dismissed as no questions of law arose.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
