Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellate Tribunal upholds CENVAT credit for vital manufacturing inputs</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COIMBATORE Versus CHEMPLAST SANMAR LTD.</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Limited, allowing CENVAT credit ... Credit on inputs used in mfg. of PVC resin - BORAQUAT C508 & BIOCIDE H 300 used to eradicate growth of Algae and Fungi in PVC plant, is eligible for credit - HCL acid used in cooling tower to improve the PH of cooling water; to prevent the pilling and oxidation of cooling, water in the pipes, is eligible for credit - HYDRAZINE HYDRATE used to remove nascent Oxygen to prevent oxidation in the pipes carrying water to boiler, is also eligible for credit as input Issues:- Appeal against denial of CENVAT credit on specific inputs such as BORAQUAT C508, BIOCIDE H 300, HCL, and HYDRAZINE HYDRATE.- Eligibility of the impugned inputs for Modvat credit.- Comparison with previous judgments like ACC v. CCE and Orient Paper Mills v. CCE, Indore.- Interpretation of the nexus between inputs and manufacturing activity for credit eligibility.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI involved a dispute over the denial of CENVAT credit on inputs including BORAQUAT C508, BIOCIDE H 300, HCL, and HYDRAZINE HYDRATE. The Commissioner (Appeals) had allowed the appeal filed by the respondent, M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Limited, based on the use of these inputs in their manufacturing process. The impugned inputs were crucial for various purposes such as maintaining the quality of demineralized water, preventing biological growth in the PVC plant, and enhancing the PH factor in the cooling tower. The Commissioner (Appeals) relied on precedents like ACC v. CCE and Orient Paper Mills v. CCE, Indore to support the eligibility of these inputs for Modvat credit.The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by the Revenue, citing the Orient Paper Mills case where certain inputs were deemed ineligible for credit as they were not directly used in the manufacturing process. However, in the current case, the impugned inputs were found to have a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity of the final products. The inputs played a crucial role in maintaining the quality and efficiency of the manufacturing process, ensuring the production of superior quality PVC resin. The Tribunal upheld the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the essential nature of the impugned inputs for the manufacturing process.The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the nexus between the inputs and the manufacturing activity for determining their eligibility for credit. It was established that inputs used for protecting equipment and ensuring the smooth operation of the manufacturing process are considered eligible inputs for credit. The Tribunal referred to previous judgments like ACC v. CCE and Orient Paper Mills v. CCE, Indore to support the decision to allow Modvat credit for the impugned inputs. The Tribunal concluded that as long as the inputs have a direct connection with the manufacturing activity and contribute to maintaining the quality and efficiency of the process, they should be eligible for credit. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the respondent, M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Limited.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found