Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 could be sustained when penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 had already been imposed for the same default.
Analysis: The appellant had already paid the service tax, interest, and 25% of the penalty. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that simultaneous penalties under Sections 76 and 78 for the same conduct amount to double jeopardy and held that the cited precedent squarely governed the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The penalty under Section 76 was not sustainable in addition to the penalty under Section 78, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.