Commission income estimated at 0.25% of bank deposits when assessee fails to maintain proper books or provide beneficiary details

ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on commission income estimation where assessee failed to maintain books of accounts or provide details of parties making deposits totaling Rs. 158 crores. Despite claiming commission income at 0.1-0.15% of deposits, assessee provided no supporting documentation or beneficiary details. CIT(A) had added commission income at 1% of total receipts. ITAT held that without proper records or evidence, commission income should be restricted to 0.25% of total bank deposits, partially allowing assessee's appeal. Separate cash deposit addition of Rs. 3,21,730 was deleted as it formed part of declared income, avoiding double taxation.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Determination of the appropriate commission rate for the assessee's income.
2. Addition of unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account.

Summary:

Issue 1: Determination of the appropriate commission rate for the assessee's income

The assessee filed a return of income for AY 2016-17 declaring total income of Rs. 4,55,650/-. The AO observed voluminous financial transactions in the assessee's bank accounts amounting to Rs. 157.98 crores. The assessee claimed to earn commission income at 0.05% from cheque discounting. However, the AO estimated the commission income at 8% due to lack of supporting evidence and added Rs. 12,65,84,000/- as commission income u/s 44AB. The CIT(A) reduced this rate to 1%, considering judicial precedents and the absence of detailed records from the assessee. The ITAT, upon review, noted the assessee's failure to provide necessary details and supporting documents and deemed a commission rate of 0.25% reasonable. Thus, the commission income was recalculated at 0.25% of the total deposits, partially allowing the assessee's appeal.

Issue 2: Addition of unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account

The AO added Rs. 3,21,730/- as unexplained cash deposits u/s 68, which the CIT(A) upheld. The assessee argued that this amount should be considered part of the declared income of Rs. 4,55,650/-. The ITAT found merit in this argument, directing the deletion of the addition, thus allowing the assessee's appeal on this ground.

Department's Appeal:

The Department's appeal, primarily challenging the reduction of the commission rate from 8% to 1%, was dismissed. The ITAT's decision to compute the commission income at 0.25% rendered the Department's appeal moot.

Conclusion:

The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the Department's appeal was dismissed. The commission income was recalculated at 0.25% of the total deposits, and the addition of unexplained cash deposits was deleted.

---