Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, who was deputed to the National Disaster Response Force after the Disaster Management (National Disaster Response Force) Rules, 2008 came into force, was entitled to deputation allowance for the period of his deputation.
Analysis: Rule 3(1) applied to personnel who had been deputed from the Central Para Military Forces by the earlier order dated 19 January 2006 and who were deemed to have been deputed under the 2008 Rules. Rule 3(2), on the other hand, governed personnel deputed later, after the Rules came into force, for disaster management purposes. The petitioner fell within the latter category. The Force was only a borrowing organisation and the terms governing the deputationist's parent service remained relevant. The attempt to deny deputation allowance by treating later entrants as deemed deputationists, or by relying on the Office Memorandum dated 17 June 2010, was held to be inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to deputation allowance and connected monetary benefits for the period 24 July 2008 to 20 March 2012.
Ratio Decidendi: Personnel deputed to the Force after the 2008 Rules came into force are governed by Rule 3(2), and cannot be denied deputation allowance merely by labelling them as deemed deputationists under Rule 3(1) or by invoking an inapplicable executive instruction.