Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, facing allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 involving commercial quantity, was entitled to regular bail by dispensing with the requirements of Section 37 of the Act.
Analysis: The allegations involved recovery of commercial quantity, so the restrictions under Section 37 ordinarily applied. However, the Court noted the absence of criminal antecedents, the prolonged custody of about two and a half years, and that the trial had not commenced though charges had been framed. On those considerations, the Court found it appropriate to relax the statutory bail conditions at that stage.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted regular bail, and the conditions of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 were dispensed with for the purpose of release on bail.