Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether prior intimation is required before blacklisting an Overseas Citizen of India cardholder or cancelling registration under section 7D of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
Analysis: The appeal concerned the scope of the Central Government's power to blacklist a person or cancel OCI registration in the interests of sovereignty, integrity, security, friendly relations with foreign countries, or the general public. The Court held that neither the Citizenship Act, 1955 nor the visa regime creates any requirement of prior intimation in such matters. It further held that decisions taken for the protection of India's sovereignty and integrity may be communicated at the time of arrival or through other appropriate means, and that a uniform rule of advance notice cannot be insisted upon.
Conclusion: Prior intimation is not before blacklisting or cancelling OCI registration under section 7D of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and the observations to the contrary were modified in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing statute confers power to blacklist or cancel OCI registration for reasons connected with sovereignty, integrity, security or public interest, no implied requirement of prior notice can be read into the exercise of that power unless the statute expressly so provides.