Court Permits Property Use with Conditions; Allows Passport Release for Travel, Ensures Ongoing Legal Safeguards Maintained.

The court addressed two key issues: modification of an order for the release of attached property and the release of a passport for international travel. For the attached property, the court allowed the applicants to occupy it upon depositing use and occupation charges, while maintaining its attached status under PMLA, prohibiting third-party rights or encumbrances. Regarding the passport, the court permitted the respondent to travel abroad, requiring notification upon return and future travel permissions, ensuring no prejudice to ongoing proceedings. The applications were disposed of, balancing the parties' interests with legal safeguards.

---

---

Issues:
1. Modification of order dated 14.07.2017 for release of attached property.
2. Release of passport and permission to travel outside the country.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Modification of order for release of attached property
The application was filed seeking modification of the order dated 14.07.2017 for the release of the attached property. The property in question was attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) as one of the assets of the applicants. The applicants had no other residential accommodation apart from the attached property, leading to concerns about its condition and safety. The court considered the circumstances and directed that the property would remain attached, but the applicants were permitted to occupy it on the deposit of use and occupation charges. The applicants were instructed not to deal with the property or create any third-party rights or encumbrances until further orders. The application was disposed of accordingly.

Issue 2: Release of passport and permission to travel outside the country
In this matter, the respondent sought the release of his passport and permission to travel abroad within specific dates. The respondent had already been discharged by an order dated 15.05.2017, with no stay on the operation of the entire order except for the release of the attached properties. Considering that the original trial court record was received and with the Registry, the court directed the release of the respondent's passport. The respondent was allowed to travel abroad as per the provided itinerary, with an obligation to inform the Department upon return and not to undertake any actions prejudicing the ongoing proceedings. Any future travel outside the country required permission from the court. The applications were disposed of with an order for Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

These judgments address the specific requests for modification of orders related to the release of attached property and the release of a passport for international travel. The court balanced the interests of the parties involved, ensuring that the property remained attached while allowing the applicants to occupy it under specified conditions. Similarly, the court granted permission for international travel with strict guidelines to safeguard the ongoing legal proceedings. The decisions reflect a nuanced approach to addressing the concerns raised by the parties within the framework of the applicable laws and regulations.

---