TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessment Halted Due to Pending Appeal; Respondents May Challenge Writ Petition by Filing Counteraffidavit.</h1> <h3>Cadence Builders And Constructions Private Limited Versus Income Tax Officer & Anr.</h3> Cadence Builders And Constructions Private Limited Versus Income Tax Officer & Anr. - TMI Issues:Challenge to notice dated 25.05.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; Challenge to order dated 31.07.2022 under Section 148A(d) and consequential notice of the same date issued under Section 148; Sustainability of impugned order and notices due to prior assessment order dated 28.03.2022 under Section 147 read with Section 144B; Validity of observation in the impugned order rendering the assessment order dated 28.03.2022 'non est'; Instructions to resist the writ petition; Restraint on the AO from continuing assessment/reassessment proceedings.Analysis:The writ petition challenges a notice dated 25.05.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, along with an order dated 31.07.2022 under Section 148A(d) and a consequential notice issued under Section 148 on the same date. The petitioner argues that these orders and notices are unsustainable as an assessment order dated 28.03.2022 was already passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Act. The petitioner has appealed against the said order to the CIT(A), which is pending consideration. The assessment order dated 28.03.2022 was triggered by a notice under Section 148 of the Act, received via email on 31.03.2021. The impugned order dated 31.07.2022 erroneously states that the assessment order dated 28.03.2022 is 'non est,' which the petitioner argues is legally incorrect as the AO had become functus officio after passing the said order.The court finds prima facie that the impugned order and notices are unsustainable since an assessment order is already in place, and an appeal is pending with the CIT(A). The respondents/revenue accept notice and state they will return with instructions. If they decide to resist the writ petition, a counteraffidavit will be filed before the next hearing date. The matter is listed for 03.02.2023, and in the meantime, the AO is restrained from continuing with the assessment/reassessment proceedings initiated based on the impugned order and notice. The parties are instructed to act based on a digitally signed copy of the order.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
