Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Assessment Halted Due to Pending Appeal; Respondents May Challenge Writ Petition by Filing Counteraffidavit. The HC found the impugned order and notices unsustainable due to the existing assessment order dated 28.03.2022, which is under appeal with the CIT(A). ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessment Halted Due to Pending Appeal; Respondents May Challenge Writ Petition by Filing Counteraffidavit.
The HC found the impugned order and notices unsustainable due to the existing assessment order dated 28.03.2022, which is under appeal with the CIT(A). The AO is restrained from proceeding with assessment/reassessment based on the impugned order. Respondents may file a counteraffidavit if resisting the writ petition. The matter is listed for 03.02.2023.
Issues: Challenge to notice dated 25.05.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; Challenge to order dated 31.07.2022 under Section 148A(d) and consequential notice of the same date issued under Section 148; Sustainability of impugned order and notices due to prior assessment order dated 28.03.2022 under Section 147 read with Section 144B; Validity of observation in the impugned order rendering the assessment order dated 28.03.2022 "non est"; Instructions to resist the writ petition; Restraint on the AO from continuing assessment/reassessment proceedings.
Analysis: The writ petition challenges a notice dated 25.05.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, along with an order dated 31.07.2022 under Section 148A(d) and a consequential notice issued under Section 148 on the same date. The petitioner argues that these orders and notices are unsustainable as an assessment order dated 28.03.2022 was already passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Act. The petitioner has appealed against the said order to the CIT(A), which is pending consideration. The assessment order dated 28.03.2022 was triggered by a notice under Section 148 of the Act, received via email on 31.03.2021. The impugned order dated 31.07.2022 erroneously states that the assessment order dated 28.03.2022 is "non est," which the petitioner argues is legally incorrect as the AO had become functus officio after passing the said order.
The court finds prima facie that the impugned order and notices are unsustainable since an assessment order is already in place, and an appeal is pending with the CIT(A). The respondents/revenue accept notice and state they will return with instructions. If they decide to resist the writ petition, a counteraffidavit will be filed before the next hearing date. The matter is listed for 03.02.2023, and in the meantime, the AO is restrained from continuing with the assessment/reassessment proceedings initiated based on the impugned order and notice. The parties are instructed to act based on a digitally signed copy of the order.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.