Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>ITAT Remands Penalty Deletion Orders for Reconsideration Following Supreme Court Guidelines on Merits.</h1> <h3>DCIT, Circle 4 (1), New Delhi Versus M/s. Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.</h3> DCIT, Circle 4 (1), New Delhi Versus M/s. Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. - TMI Issues:- Appeal against the order of CIT (Appeals) for A.Y 1993-1994, 1996-1997 & 1997-1998 regarding the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c).Analysis:The appeals were filed by the Revenue against the common order of CIT (Appeals) for three assessment years. The main issue raised in all appeals was whether the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) should be deleted. During the hearing, the assessee did not appear, and their application for adjournment was rejected. The appeals were decided ex parte, with the Revenue represented by the learned DR who relied on the order of the AO.Upon reviewing the submissions and orders, the ITAT found that the CIT (Appeals) had deleted the penalties based on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. v. CIT 289 ITR 83. However, this decision was later overruled by the Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt. Ltd. 304 ITR 308 (SC). Since the penalties were not decided on their merits and the CIT (Appeals) did not adjudicate the issue further, the ITAT decided to set aside the matter and directed the CIT (Appeals) to re-examine the appeals of the assessee on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity for both parties to be heard.As a result, the appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, and the issue of penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) was remanded back to the CIT (Appeals) for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of CIT v. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt. Ltd.