Assessee wins partial relief as ITAT applies 2.8% average gross profit rate on undisclosed Pan Masala turnover instead of 3.7%

ITAT Lucknow-AT partly allowed assessee's appeal regarding profit determination on undisclosed turnover from Pan Masala trading discovered during search operations. The assessee had surrendered income but disputed AO's application of 3.7% gross profit rate based on earlier years versus actual 1.91% for the relevant year. ITAT held that average gross profit rate of 2.8% should apply to unaccounted turnover, allowing Rs. 7,73,600 expense deduction. The tribunal dismissed claims for commission income expenses due to lack of substantiation and upheld CIT(A)'s turnover calculation corrections, reducing the final taxable amount accordingly.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Deletion of addition on account of undisclosed income from commission.
3. Confirmation of addition under the head undisclosed income by applying the G.P. rate.
4. Confirmation of addition on account of expenses deemed to have been incurred in earning commission income.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 36,31,910/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to a difference in turnover. The AO had made this addition after examining the facts and applying a gross profit (G.P.) rate of 3.7% based on the previous year's audited accounts. The CIT(A), however, found discrepancies in the figures and reduced the unaccounted turnover. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s revised calculation of unaccounted turnover and directed the AO to apply an average G.P. rate of 2.8% (derived from the previous year's 3.7% and the current year's 1.91%) on the revised turnover figure. Consequently, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal on this issue.

2. Deletion of Addition on Account of Undisclosed Income from Commission:
The AO observed that the assessee had surrendered Rs. 6,00,00,000/- as undisclosed income from commission during the search proceedings but declared only Rs. 5.5 crore in the return of income, claiming Rs. 50,00,000/- as expenses without evidence. The CIT(A) allowed a relief of Rs. 5,00,000/- and confirmed the addition of Rs. 45,00,000/-. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting the lack of substantiation for the claimed expenses. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds related to this issue.

3. Confirmation of Addition under the Head Undisclosed Income by Applying the G.P. Rate:
The assessee argued that the current year's G.P. rate of 1.91%, which was accepted by the AO for recorded turnover, should be applied to the unaccounted turnover. The Tribunal, however, held that applying the same G.P. rate to both accounted and unaccounted turnover would not deter unaccounted transactions. To balance justice and deterrence, the Tribunal directed the AO to apply an average G.P. rate of 2.8% on the unaccounted turnover, as calculated by the CIT(A). This resulted in a partial allowance of the assessee's appeal on this issue.

4. Confirmation of Addition on Account of Expenses Deemed to Have Been Incurred in Earning Commission Income:
The assessee claimed Rs. 50,00,000/- as expenses to earn Rs. 6,00,00,000/- in commission income. The CIT(A) allowed only Rs. 5,00,000/- due to a lack of evidence for the remaining amount. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order, given the assessee's inability to substantiate the expenses. Thus, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds related to this issue.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal by adjusting the G.P. rate applied to the unaccounted turnover and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s relief on account of the revised turnover calculation and the partial allowance of expenses. The final order pronounced that the assessee's appeal is partly allowed, whereas the Revenue's appeal is dismissed.

---