Statutory protection for public servants justified quashing vexatious criminal proceedings arising from official tax duties.

Criminal proceedings against a tax officer were quashed because the alleged acts were reasonably connected with official duty and fell within statutory protection for acts done in good faith under the tax law and criminal procedure protections for public servants. The Court applied the settled test for inherent jurisdiction, asking whether prosecution could proceed despite the statutory bar and whether continuation of the complaint would amount to abuse of process. On the facts, the complaint was found vexatious and unsupported by any basis to deny protection, so quashing was necessary to secure the ends of justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings against the tax officer were liable to be quashed in view of the statutory protection for acts done in good faith and in discharge of official duty, and whether continuation of the complaint amounted to abuse of process.

Analysis: The proceedings arose out of an inspection and seizure-related dispute in the course of tax administration. The governing provisions conferred protection on officers for acts done or purported to be done under the Act, and also required consideration of the protection available to public servants under the criminal procedure law. The relevant test was whether the alleged acts bore a reasonable connection with official duty and whether the complaint disclosed a case where prosecution could proceed despite the statutory bar. The Court applied the principles governing protection of public servants and the settled grounds for exercise of inherent powers to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. On the facts, the complaint was found to be vexatious and unsupported by a basis to deny the statutory protection.

Conclusion: The criminal proceedings were held liable to be quashed and the appellant succeeded.

Final Conclusion: The complaint could not be allowed to proceed against the officer in the face of the statutory protection and the circumstances showed abuse of the judicial process.

Ratio Decidendi: Where allegations against a public servant arise from acts reasonably connected with official duty and the complaint amounts to vexatious abuse of process, the Court may invoke inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings in order to give effect to statutory protection and secure the ends of justice.

---