Seizure Order Overturned: Goods and Vehicle Released After Compliance with E-way Bill Under UPGST Act.

The HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside the seizure order and penalty notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the UPGST Act. The Court found the petitioner had complied with E-way bill requirements before detention. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and vehicle, favoring the petitioner.

---

---

Issues:
1. Detention of goods for not being accompanied by an E-way bill.
2. Validity of seizure order and penalty notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the UPGST Act.
3. Compliance with E-way bill requirements before detention and seizure of goods.
4. Decision on the writ petition challenging the detention and seizure.

Analysis:
1. The goods were detained by respondent no. 4 during transportation from Chattisgarh to Haryana for not having an E-way bill. The petitioner presented the E-way bill generated before the detention, indicating compliance with the requirement.

2. The High Court examined the relevant documents, including the Invoice, Goods receipt, and E-way Bills, attached to the writ petition. It was observed that the E-way bill under the UPGST Act was obtained by the petitioner well before the detention and seizure, containing all necessary details.

3. Based on the evidence presented, the Court found no irregularity in the transaction. Consequently, the seizure order, penalty notice issued under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the Act, and the related proceedings were set aside, favoring the petitioner.

4. The writ petition was allowed, and the Court directed the immediate release of the goods and vehicle seized on 07.04.2018 in favor of the petitioner. The judgment highlighted the importance of complying with statutory requirements and the relevance of timely documentation in such cases.

---